Last Updated on Aug 22, 2022 by Aradhana Gotur

Update – no charges on UPI transactions

The government has cleared the air about considering imposing charges on Unified Payments Interface (UPI)-based services. It clarifies that there is no consideration to levy any charges for UPI services. The government also mentioned that the service providers have to consider other means for cost recovery. In the last week, the internet overflowed with speculations that the RBI had floated a discussion paper seeking feedback on charging UPI transactions.

What were the speculations?

The Unified Payment Interface (UPI) is India’s most preferred digital payment platform. As high as Rs. 10 tn is processed in over 6 bn transactions on a monthly basis. UPI is a funds transfer and a merchant payment system. In 2020, the government mandated a zero-charge framework for UPI transactions, but this might soon change.

The RBI has asked for public suggestions and feedback on UPI and other topics in its “Discussion Paper on Charges in Payment Systems”. Here are the details:


  1. Should the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) impose a “tiered” charge on UPI fund transfers and payments based on different amount bands? The apex bank has sought stakeholders’ suggestions and feedback on this before 3rd October 2022.
  2. If UPI transactions are charged, should a fixed amount as the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) be imposed regardless of the transaction value or an MDR be applied based on the amount transacted?
  3. If RBI should decide on the charges or allow the market to do it. The Central Bank has explained that a stakeholder can incur a processing fee of Rs. 2 for a person-to-merchant (P2M) transaction of Rs. 800 on UPI.
  4. Regarding debit cards, whether the interchange fee, which is a component of the MDR paid to the card issuer by the acquirer, can be regulated. Also, should MDR for debit cards be uniform across merchants regardless of turnover?
  5. Can RuPay cards be treated differently from other debit cards affiliated with international card networks MDR-wise? Effective 1st January 2020, the government has made the MDR for RuPay debit cards zero.
  6. On credit cards where the RBI has not issued regulatory mandates or has intervened on MDR, should the cost of performing transactions be delinked from the cost of funds (credit) and credit risk?

The paper noted that the RBI could be justified in recovering the cost of its investments and operational expenditure in RTGS as it involves the spending of public money.

RBI highlighted that the charges imposed on RTGS are not a source of earnings.

The paper mentioned, “RTGS is a system used mainly for large value transactions and is predominantly used by banks and large institutions / merchants to facilitate real-time settlement. Does such a system, with institutions as members, require RBI to provide free transactions?”.

It also noted that being the operator of NEFT, the RBI has invested in implementing and operating the infrastructure. Therefore, although there may not be a profit motive in operating NEFT, recovering a reasonable amount can be justified. The paper also highlighted the possibility of imposing charges on IMPS transactions.

Aradhana Gotur
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The blog posts/articles on our platform are purely the author’s personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of Anchorage Technologies Private Limited (ATPL) or any of its associates. The content in these posts/articles is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as professional financial advice. Should you need such advice, please consult a professional financial or tax advisor. The content on our platform may include opinions, analysis, or commentary, which are subject to change, without notice, based on market conditions or other factors. Further, the use of any third-party websites or services linked on the website is at the user's discretion and risk. ATPL is not responsible for the content, accuracy, or security of external sites. Investments in the securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Registration granted by SEBI, membership of BASL (in case of IAs) and certification from NISM in no way guarantee performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of returns to investors. The examples and/or securities quoted (if any) are for illustration only and are not recommendatory. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk. In no event will ATPL be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

By accessing this platform and its blog section, you acknowledge and agree to the Terms and Conditions of this website, Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.