Fund has been able to generate better returns compared to other funds in the same category
Less expense ratio implies better returns over the long term
Fund has not been able to generate better price return than bank FD
Total holdings with red flags is insignificant
Expense RatioExpense Ratio | No LabelNo Label | No LabelNo Label |
---|---|---|
0.32 | 7.38 | 3.97 |
No LabelNo Label | No LabelNo Label | No LabelNo Label |
---|---|---|
0.48 | 7.39 | 2.85 |
Banking and PSU funds are the debt funds that lend money to banks and public sector companies only. The risk of default is less as the borrowers are of high quality. The performance also depends on the interest rates in the economy.
PlanPlan | Lock inLock in | Exit LoadExit Load |
---|---|---|
IDCW | 0 yrs | 0.00% |
SIP Inv.SIP Inv. | Min. LumpsumMin. Lumpsum |
---|---|
Allowed | ₹ 1,000 |
BenchmarkBenchmark |
---|
NIFTY Banking and PSU Debt Index |
Gains are added to taxable income and taxed according to the individual's income tax slab
Gains are taxed at 20% with indexation benefit
Investment frequency
Monthly
One Time
Monthly Investment Amt. (₹)
Investment period (years)
Invested
₹—
+Returns (0%)
₹—
-₹—
You make
₹—
ReturnsFund's average annual rolling returns over the last three years is compared against the funds from the same category
Fund has been able to generate better returns compared to other funds in the same category